Tuesday, January 22, 2013

International Crimes Tribunal in Bangladesh: DEATH for Bachchu Razakar

Declares war crimes tribunal in its first verdict; fugitive convict gets 30 days for appeal with SC


The international crimes tribunal made history yesterday by sentencing Abul Kalam Azad to death, in its maiden judgment, for genocide and crimes against humanity during the Liberation War.
The 65-year-old fugitive, also known as Bachchu Razakar, was found guilty of killing 14 Hindus, raping two women, torturing two other persons and setting homes ablaze in Faridpur, his birthplace.
The judgment turns the spotlight on the nine-month war in which the Pakistani army along with its collaborators had killed three million Bangalees and violated more than a quarter of a million women.
The nation yesterday saw the first sentencing of a war criminal through a trial, a demand that had remained pending since the country was liberated in 1971.
“We should not forget the millions of victims who deserve that their tormentors are held accountable,” Justice Obaidul Hassan and two fellow judges said in written summary of the judgment. “The passage of time does not diminish the guilt. Justice delayed is no longer justice denied.”
The long-cherished International Crimes Tribunal-1 was formed in March 2010, but it was the Tribunal-2, formed only in March 2012, that delivered the first verdict.
The tribunals formed to prosecute, try and punish the perpetrators of crimes are seen by many as a courageous endeavour to come out of the culture of impunity in Bangladesh.
The prosecution had stacked eight charges against the expelled Jamaat-e-Islami leader for crimes he committed four decades ago in Faridpur.
But Tribunal-2 Chairman Justice Obaidul Hassan and members Justice Md Mozibur Rahman Miah and Judge M Shahinur Islam unanimously held Azad guilty in six charges related to crimes against humanity and one for genocide.
The only charge, which the prosecution failed to prove, was based on the abduction, torture and confining of freedom fighter Abu Yusuf Pakhi in Faridpur.
“In dealing with the charges we have found that the accused Abul Kalam Azad alias Bachchu himself had physically participated being accompanied by his armed accomplices to the commission of crimes and as such he held criminally responsible for the direct commission of crimes proved,” the judges said in the verdict.
Azad was sentenced to death for four of the charges, although found "guilty beyond doubt" in seven.
The tribunal noted that he deserved imprisonment for the other three offences but the court decided not to award separate sentences as he had already received the death sentence.
For the four offences, he will be sentenced to death and be “hanged by the neck till he is dead” under the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act 1973, the tribunal said.
“Since the convicted accused has been absconding the 'sentence of death' as awarded above shall be executed after causing his arrest or when he surrenders before the Tribunal, whichever is earlier."
Azad went into hiding seven hours before Tribunal-2 issued an arrest warrant against him on April 3, 2012. His trial was held in his absence and a tribunal-appointed lawyer moved for him.
Since the tribunals enjoy the status of High Court, a convict has the right to file an appeal only with the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court within 30 days of the judgment delivery by the tribunal.
Azad will not have the right to appeal unless he surrenders or is arrested within 30 days, as a convict cannot appeal in absentia, some legal experts said.
But other experts believe that if he is arrested or he surrenders after the 30 days and seeks the permission of the Appellate Division to file an appeal, the apex court has the discretionary power to consider it.
“The accused [Azad] cannot be considered merely as an absentee accused. He is an absconded accused," said the Tribunal-2. “Evading trial for the offences of which he has been charged with signifies his culpability too. The accused deliberately waived his right to be present at trial. This conduct adds further to his culpability."
"Therefore, the fact of absconding of the accused can also be taken as an adverse and material incriminating circumstance to reinforce the evidence and circumstances available in the case," the judges said in the judgment.
According to an official at Detective Branch of Police, Azad fled to India, crossing the border in Dinajpur illegally -- without a passport or a visa.
Some sources suggest that he is now in Karachi of Pakistan.
A red alert will be issued through the Interpol to have Azad detained and brought back home, Law Minister Shafique Ahmed said yesterday.
Several hundred lawyers, journalists and observers gathered at the tribunal to witness the maiden judgment delivery yesterday. Many could not get in and had to wait outside. In parts of the country, people from a wider spectrum of society took out celebratory processions.
A three-tier security measure was in place in and around the old high court building where the tribunals are situated.
After the verdict, many were seen unable to control happy tears.
Considering the huge gathering and the tiny size of its courtroom, the Tribunal-2 judges sat in the larger courtroom of Traibunal-1 to deliver the judgment.
Justice Obaidul Hassan, chief of Tribunal-2, started reading out a 24-page summery of the verdict around 10:45am. It took him an hour to finish.
The full judgment comes in 336 paragraphs on 112 pages.
"It has been proved from testimony of witnesses that the accused had directly participated to the commission of crimes as an armed member of the Razakar force,” the tribunal said in its conclusion.
"Besides, we have found that for the reason of his atrocious acts in the locality, the accused was widely known as 'Razakar'."
As per the law, the tribunal said, "An individual incurs criminal liability for the direct commission of a crime, whether as an individual or jointly."
On November 4, 2012, the tribunal indicted Azad, who used to regularly preach on a couple of private TV channels.
Since November 26, a total of 22 prosecution witnesses, including victims and family members of victims, and the investigation officer of the case, testified against him.
The tribunal-appointed defence counsel failed to produce any witnesses due to “non-cooperation” of Azad's family members.
Sahidur Rahman, conducting prosecutor of the case, expressed his satisfaction over the verdict.
Defence counsel Abdus Shukur Khan said the accused did not get justice.
"The accused will be benefited if he goes to the apex court against the verdict," he said, adding that the tribunal-appointed counsel does not have authority to file an appeal against the verdict.
Azad was charged with the killing of Chitta Ranjan Das in Faridpur in 1971. In an instant reaction to The Daily Star, his son Gopal Das said: "My father's soul will now rest in peace."
He thanked the government for holding the trial.
"Like me, thousands of sons, daughters and family members of martyrs are waiting to see other war criminals walking the gallows," Gopal said.
Some journalists rushed to Azad's home in Dhaka after the verdict but his wife refused to open the door or talk to them. She, however, did say that according to her knowledge, her husband was not involved in any crime and that she does not know Azad's whereabouts.
During the first week of June 1971, Azad and his accomplices apprehended Ranjit Kumar Nath alias Babu Nath from Khabashpur in Faridpur town and took him to the Pakistani army camp at Faridpur Circuit House.
After discussion with Pakistani Major Akram Koraishi and Ali Ahsan Mohammad Mojaheed, Ranjit was taken to a house at Bihari Colony, kept confined to a room there and tortured with the intent to kill, but he somehow escaped. Mojaheed, now secretary general of Jamaat-e-Islami facing war crimes charges, was a top leader of Islami Chhatra Sangha, the then student wing of the Islamist party.
On May 14, 1971, Azad accompanied by 10-12 armed Razakars attacked the village of Kolaran of Boalmari in Faridpur. There, he shot landlord Sudhangshu Mohan Roy and injured his son Monimoy Roy.
On May 16, 1971, Azad accompanied by 10-12 armed Razakars captured Madhab Chandra Biswas of Purura Namapara village of Nagarkanda in Faridpur, about 300 yards from his house. He shot Madhab to death.
On June 8, 1971, Azad along with 10-12 armed Razakars attacked Natibodia village in Boalmari of Faridpur and took away two females from the house. He along with four to five of his accomplices raped them.
On June 3, 1971, Azad along with 10-12 armed Razakars launched a planned attack on the Hindu-dominated village Fulbaria of Nagarkanda in Faridpur and looted houses.
Accompanied by seven-eight accomplices, Azad dragged out Chitta Ranjan Das from his house and shot him dead.
On May 17, 1971, Azad accompanied by 30-35 armed Razakars launched a planned attack on the Hindu-dominated Hasamdia village of Boalmari in Faridpur. They looted and burnt houses of Hindu civilians and shot nine Hindus to death.
On May 18, 1971, Azad along with seven-eight armed Razakars attacked the house of Guru Das of Ujirpur Bazarpara of Saltha in Faridpur and abducted his daughter and tortured her keeping her locked up for seven to eight days.
The girl was released, but she committed suicide when the accomplices of Azad tried to take her again. 

Click Here to See Summary of ICT Verdict in Abul Kalam Azad Case
Click Here to See Full Text of the Judgment
Click Here to See Charges in Full 

Source: The Daily Star, Dhaka, 22 January 2013; link: http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=266151

Related Report:Verdict answers some questions

No comments:

Post a Comment